What argument did the university make in Regents v. Bakke?

A) The students was not a good candidate to be a doctor.

B) Racial quotas were not used to make admission decisions.

C) Minority applicants did not receive special treatment.

D) Minority students with Lower grades were admitted.

Hurry being timed

The Correct Answer is D

Minority students with Lower grades were admitted.

Explanation:

Regents of the University of California V. Bakke

Bakke a white student, sued California because he was denied admission twice to medical school, even when 16 minorities were admitted who were have a lower score than him. Case claimed affirmative action plans stating that they caused opposite discrimination. Court agreed with Bakke, however, the court also ruled that a strict quota system was unconstitutional and ordered the university to admitted Bake into the med school.

It might be b i don't know