McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it
1) applied the Second Amendment to state government.
2) rejected the idea that the Second Anendment applies to state government.
3) conclued that the Second Amendment applies only to state governments and not to the federal government
4) upheld the state of llinois's restrictions on gun ownership by former felons.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it 1) applied the Second Amendment to state government. 2) rejected the idea that the ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which answer was not an impact of English exploration? A) increased fish industry B) fur trade with native Americans C) the English gained huge amounts of gold D) war broke out between Spain and England
Answers (1)
Which statement Best describes the trail of tears
Answers (1)
Using complete sentences, describe the structure of the government of Israel.
Answers (1)
The policy of mercantilism was intended to (1) enrich European governments (2) end slavery in the Americas (3) promote the isolation of Asia (4) establish religious freedom in New Spain
Answers (1)
How significant were the actions of John Brown in the intensifying conflict between the North and South
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Why did Lord North decided to repeal the townshed acts
Answers (1)
A difference between Babur and Akbar was that
Answers (1)
Which of the following is not a characteristic of a weak economy? A. A low unemployment rate B. A high unemployment rate C. A decreased GDP D. A high inflation rate
Answers (1)
In what way did the marbury decision enhance checks and balances
Answers (1)
How does this graph show the importance of government spending to millions of Americans?
Answers (1)