Ask Question
25 December, 21:13

Which of the following could have averted the disaster

Japan relies heavily on nuclear meltdown at some of its nuclear power: however, in 2011 Japan experienced a nuclear meltdown at some of its nuclear power plants. When the reactors detected an earthquake, emergency generators pumped water to cool the fuel rods, but subsequent tsunami flooding caused the generators to fail which caused radiation to enter the atmosphere.

A. tougher flooding safety measures

B. Eliminating the emergency generators

C. less government involvement

D. looser regulations fi=or the power industry

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 25 December, 22:12
    0
    With the presence of tougher flooding safety measure, the disaster caused by Tsunami in 2011 in Japan could have been averted.

    Answer: Option A

    Explanation:

    The Nuclear Power Station was attacked by the fierce force of Tsunami on 11 March 2011 and caused the worst nuclear disaster. A vast land of Japan was evacuated and needed years of cleaning to get rid of the nuclear radiation.

    With clear, researches, it resulted that the prime cause of nuclear disaster by the influence of Tsunami was the lack of potential safety to the nuclear power plants. The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency of Japan was held responsible for such a lack of system and the safety measures were secured for future.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following could have averted the disaster Japan relies heavily on nuclear meltdown at some of its nuclear power: however, in ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers