History

Juliet Barry

20 January, 11:44

In worcester v. georgia, supreme court justice john marshall declared: "the act of georgia under which the plaintiff [worchester] was prosecuted is void. the acts of georgia are [against] the constitution, laws, and treaties of the united states." this ruling supports the idea of:

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “In worcester v. georgia, supreme court justice john marshall declared: "the act of georgia under which the plaintiff [worchester] was ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Which of the following can you infer from the fifth pillar of Islam?

Many urban immigrant communities tended to support political machines despite their inherent corruption because A) These organizations provided some needed services, jobs, and emergency aid B) Many top office holders worked low-level, blue-collar

What did the United States use in the attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 to end the war?

What illness did Barbara Jordan die from?

How did whites feel about African Americans in North America and what were they used to do for them

New Questions in History

Why did most of president wilson's cabinet members support the british?

Did Muslims want their own country? A. True B. False

How did the mujahidin of Afghanistan influence the Eastern Europeans?

What best defines an indentured servant?

This lack of supervision is referred to as A) "salutary neglect." B) "headright system." C) "prolonged isolation." D) "virtual representation."