Ask Question
31 March, 13:06

Do you think civilian (nonmilitary) control of the military is an important part of U. S. democracy? Why or why not? What are the advantages to this system? Are there disadvantages? Write a well-developed paragraph expressing your opinion.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 31 March, 14:37
    0
    Civilian control of the military is an important component of Republican government. Civilian control means that military leaders are subordinate to political leaders. The Commander in Chief of the military is the President, a political leader. He is responsible for making the final decisions regarding whether or not the military should engage in conflict. This is a safeguard in a democratic society and prevents the military from using its power to assert political control. The disadvantages are few to none. This system of subordination has worked well in the United States. The President also has the right to suspend habeas corpus and broad powers to ensure law and order in the case of an emergency,
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Do you think civilian (nonmilitary) control of the military is an important part of U. S. democracy? Why or why not? What are the ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers