A historian studying the Roman Empire reads a letter written by a Roman soldier stationed in Great Britain in 70 CE. Which of the following best describes the letter? A. Biased source B. Primary source C. Secondary source D. Historiographical source

Question

History

Brittany Watkins

20 November, 23:05

A historian studying the Roman Empire reads a letter written by a Roman soldier stationed in Great Britain in 70 CE. Which of the following best describes the letter? A. Biased source B. Primary source C. Secondary source D. Historiographical source

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Evelyn · Answer 1

The answer is B, Primary Source.

Why? A letter written in the past is an actual historical artifact and is a personal account of something the person experienced. A account of something a person actually experienced is a primary source about whatever events are described.

A biased source would be an account that is from a source that has an incentive to distort history.

A secondary source would be a work that describes or analyzes a primary source. For example, an account written about the letter by me or you would be a secondary source.

A Historigraphical source is a history text that is informed by both primary source and secondary sources.