Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources

A. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical. They describe

B. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries

C. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions

D. They are extremely rare and much harder for his doings to locate

Question

History

Billy Mcbride

2 October, 15:33

Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources

A. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical. They describe

B. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries

C. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions

D. They are extremely rare and much harder for his doings to locate

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Finn Herring · Answer 1

The answer is A

Explanation:

Primary or first-order sources are the remnants of the past that have come directly from a historical event. They can authentically testify to it. They are stored in their original place (where they were created) or in the designated institutions (archives, museums, libraries). Secondary sources refer to quotations and comments based on primary sources, therefore, they are indirect sources based on primary sources.