Ask Question
14 April, 16:27

The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as

a compromise.

a vote against racial quotas.

a vote for racial quotas.

a victory for medical students.

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 14 April, 16:38
    0
    a) compromise.

    Explanation:

    The case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a case ruled by the US Supreme Court about racial quotas in universities.

    It is considered a compromise because the decision declared racial quotas unconstitutional, but also decided that race can be used as a criteria in the admissions decisions of universities.
  2. 14 April, 17:53
    0
    Confirmed: a comprise
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as a compromise. a vote against racial quotas. a vote for racial quotas. a ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers