Ask Question
24 October, 20:19

I'm Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the:

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 24 October, 22:38
    0
    If your answers choices are

    a: freedom of assembly

    b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure

    c: protection against double jeopardy

    d: right to avoid self-incrimination

    Then the correct answer is B protection against unreasonable search and seizure
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “I'm Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the: ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers