What is Jackson's argument in response to Calhoun's position?

Is it with the argument they had over nullification. In that case, Jackson's argument was that he believed that nullification over the tariff of 1828 would hurt or even destroy the Union. The tariff of 1828 was a imported tax that came from manufactured goods Europe. The North was happy because the Industrial Revolution over there, but the south was unhappy because they had cotton trade to Europe as their profit they are making.