Ask Question
12 June, 11:26

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?

O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions

O B. When it is written by an academic professional

O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event

directly

O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 12 June, 12:05
    0
    A

    Explanation:

    Ommiting information is a sign of unreliability as it manipulates what readers see and can create false conclusions.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers