What was the difference between bombing military targets in the United Kingdom, and bombing the city of London? A. Bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't B. Bombing military targets didn't force the U. K. to surrender, but bombing London did C. Military targets were bombed by Japan, while London was bombed by the Nazis D. London was bombed before the U. S. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward

Question

History

Asa Schultz

1 September, 13:46

What was the difference between bombing military targets in the United Kingdom, and bombing the city of London? A. Bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't B. Bombing military targets didn't force the U. K. to surrender, but bombing London did C. Military targets were bombed by Japan, while London was bombed by the Nazis D. London was bombed before the U. S. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Seth Wang · Answer 1

The correct answer is A. Bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't

Strategic Bombing is a way of a bombing that is designed to destroy a country's ability to wage war by demoralizing civilians and targeting features of an enemy's infrastructure.

At the beginning of WWII all nations maintained a policy of only attacking military targets only, this avoided the killing of civilians. But the German Luftwaffe began bombing British cities, like London. This was used to demoralize the population and force the surrender of the UK - what did not happen -.

Lance Mccann · Answer 2

the answer is C!

Explanation:

trust me; P