Ask Question
9 December, 06:11

What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free?

A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.

B. Scott now lived in Missouri where slavery was legal.

C. The owners had purchased Scott legally, so they should be able to take him where they

wished.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 9 December, 08:09
    0
    Answer is A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free? A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process. B. Scott now ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers