What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free?
A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.
B. Scott now lived in Missouri where slavery was legal.
C. The owners had purchased Scott legally, so they should be able to take him where they
wished.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free? A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process. B. Scott now ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which word best describes the main idea of the following statement form a Venetian Merchant? "While I come to church every week, I do not want the church coming to my business or to city hall." A. Humanism B. Individualism C. Hinduism D.
Answers (1)
What was a joint stock company?
Answers (1)
How did relations between britain and germany change between the munich conference and the invasion of poland?
Answers (1)
How did shakespear make money
Answers (1)
How did the boundaries change between Mexico and the United States after the Mexican-American War?
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
Why was the great wall of china considered a zone of transition
Answers (1)
Adult soprano, alto, tenor, and bass voices each have different tone colors. cross out A. True cross out B. False
Answers (1)
Under the separation of powers principle, laws can only be made by the people the courts the Congress the President
Answers (2)
The only non communist nation in the balkans in 1948 was
Answers (1)
Which is one way religion has contributed to ongoing challenges in the Middle East?
Answers (1)