Who would have benefited more if the Missouri Compromise had stayed in effect?
A. The South because they would have gained more slave states.
B The South because they wanted to transition to free states.
C The North because it will get more inexpensive cotton from western states.
D The North because they would have gained more free states.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Who would have benefited more if the Missouri Compromise had stayed in effect? A. The South because they would have gained more slave ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Why did the French play a limited role in the Atlantic slave trade
Answers (1)
What did Columbus promise to do for Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain when they agreed to fund his voyages
Answers (1)
One similarity between Jomo Kenyatta and Kwame Nkrumah.
Answers (1)
Who did u. s. officials determine was behind the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001?
Answers (1)
What does Congress have the right to do in order to enforce this law? (13th Amendment)
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
I'm a mixed market economy, what is a typical way the government can reduce unemployment
Answers (1)
True or False: The allies fought against the Central Powers in WW1
Answers (1)
Which of these decides the verdict in a criminal trial? The prosecutor
Answers (1)
What is not a direct result of rapid industrial expansion in China? the one-child policy widespread pollution more economic opportunities the Enterprise Law
Answers (1)
One of the economic factors which led to the Reformation is that the monarchs thought they should control church properties. True False
Answers (1)