History

Dillon

13 April, 07:19

What was the long-term economic effect of the Punic Wars on Rome?

A: The loss of territory drained Roman funds.

B: Payments to the army bankrupted the Romans.

C: The end of slave labor cost farmers greatly.

D: The conquests brought great power and wealth to the Romans.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “What was the long-term economic effect of the Punic Wars on Rome? A: The loss of territory drained Roman funds. B: Payments to the army ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

The knowledge known on earth is only a small part of God's knowledge True False

The government put immigration laws in place to ... A. prevent the population from growing too much. B. keep certain diseases from spreading to the United States. C. preserve the original culture of the United States. D.

World War I propaganda referred to Germans as "Huns" to make them seem: A. Silly. B. Untrustworthy. C. Barbaric. D. Strong.

Economic globalization forces local companies to compete with

How did trade affect the spread of religion during the Middle Ages?

New Questions in History

Did spartacus fight any animals?

Which ancient civilization's artwork did the etruscans mimic? a. aegean b. babylonian c. egyptian d. sumerian

1. What happened in the electoral college in the election of 1800? * A. Jefferson won a majority of the electoral votes and became President B. Burr won a majority of the electoral votes and became President, C.

What best describes the two central ideas Jefferson expresses in the Declaration of Independence? The King of Great Britain has no real power over the colonies since they never consented to his authority.

The_ and romantic ice shelves are major landforms in Antarctica