How would an historian best respond to the comment, "History is simply a series of events in chronological order."

True, with fascinating information of who, what, where, why, and how to explain it well.

True, with fascinating information of who, whay, where, why, and possibly some bias and perspective of the writer that we can explore.

True, but you are leaving out the best part: "Why?

True, and we are so lucky to have this many events to learn about and not make their same mistakes.

True with fascinating information on who, what, where, why. and how and how to exsplain it well.

The correct answer is B) True, with fascinating information of who, what, where, why, and possibly some bias and perspective of the writer that we can explore.

A historian would best respond to the comment, "History is simply a series of events in chronological order" in this way: "True, with fascinating information of who, what, where, why, and possibly some bias and perspective of the writer that we can explore."

The job of a professional historian is to research all the different versions of the participants in a historical event. If the historian just takes the winner version, it could be biased. The Historian takes into consideration all sides of the story, do research, compare versions and historical moments in order to understand what really happened and transmit it to the public.