Ask Question
HistoryHistory
5 March, 04:59

What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 5 March, 07:30
    0
    He argued that because he was in a slave free state that he is technically not a slave to his master "which is accompany with Dred Scott", and that he dose not have to go back with him to the slave state where they came from.

    PS: This also brought the attention of the Supreme Court.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case? ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What did the french gain from their colonies
Answers (1)
Who would have been happier with their representation in the Senate, small states or large states?
Answers (2)
Why is Sumer considered an advanced civilization of their time period in history
Answers (1)
How did the Etruscans influence the Roman economy? A They changed the tax structure. B They brought new crops to plant. C They developed a trading network. D They established a monetary system. IT IS NOT B
Answers (2)
The policy which sought to remove Native Americans from territories they had lived in for generation was known as ... 1. five tribes of North America 2. Worcester's v Georgia 3. Native American expulsion 4. Indian removal
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which islamic dynasty initiated the moorish culture into spain?
Answers (1)
Mussolini claimed that fascism was a bulwark against which ideology?
Answers (1)
What kind of noun is myself?
Answers (2)
Why would the federalists think the voters would be angered by the embargo
Answers (1)
Which city was selected to be the capital city of the proposed State of Sequoyah? A. Guthrie B. Muskogee C. Oklahoma City D. Atoka
Answers (1)
Home » History » What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Sign Up Forgot Password?