Ask Question
15 February, 01:05

A secondary source is written by someone who took part in the events described true or false

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 15 February, 01:15
    0
    True because secondary is like second hand so the writer took part of it
  2. 15 February, 04:28
    0
    It is False! so super false.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “A secondary source is written by someone who took part in the events described true or false ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers