Ask Question
13 February, 18:50

The lack of success of minor parties to be the "party in power" or to be a "major player" has actually allowed them to take a clearer cut stand on specific issues. true or faulse

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 13 February, 20:32
    0
    That statement is true

    If you're a major player in the government, you have to take care of all the issues that happen within the people, even the one that's deemed as 'not particularly important'. But if you're a minor player, you can choose to take a specific and major issue
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “The lack of success of minor parties to be the "party in power" or to be a "major player" has actually allowed them to take a clearer cut ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers