Second, the Soviet Union, unlike previous aspirants to hegemony, is animated by a new fanatic faith, anti-thetical to our own, and seeks to impose its absolute authority over the rest of the world. Conflict has, therefore, become endemic and is waged, on the part of the Soviet Union, by violent or non-violent methods in accordance with the dictates of expediency. With the development of increasingly terrifying weapons of mass destruction, every individual faces the ever-present possibility of annihilation should the conflict enter the phase of total war. in your own words

Question

History

Christina Miranda

17 November, 10:35

Second, the Soviet Union, unlike previous aspirants to hegemony, is animated by a new fanatic faith, anti-thetical to our own, and seeks to impose its absolute authority over the rest of the world. Conflict has, therefore, become endemic and is waged, on the part of the Soviet Union, by violent or non-violent methods in accordance with the dictates of expediency. With the development of increasingly terrifying weapons of mass destruction, every individual faces the ever-present possibility of annihilation should the conflict enter the phase of total war. in your own words

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Karlee Parrish · Answer 1

There Is a big controversial case about Russia and the Soviet Union. many think they are ruthless warseekers. But with the possibility of an eminent nuclear war we should make all means neceserry in the case that there is eminent war outbreak.

Crumbles · Answer 2

The soviet union is an extremely dangerous and sketchy country.