The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed amendment to a military appropriations bill that would
a. regulate competition between free and slave states.
b. permit the slavery issue to be determined by popular sovereignty.
c. establish slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico.
d. ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed amendment to a military appropriations bill that would a. regulate competition between free and slave ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which pair of Supreme Court cases demonstrates that the Supreme Court can change an earlier decision?
Answers (1)
What did rhode island, established in 1636 and new hampshire founded in 1638 have in common
Answers (2)
Which of the following would be a correct definition of the system of mercantilism? A. A nation's prosperity depended on the amount of wealth it controlled. B. The amount of accessible wealth in the world is continually growing. C.
Answers (2)
Which of the following includes two ways that Americans can participate in their democracy? A. Vote and run for office B. Read newspapers and volunteer at the local food bank C. Get a drivers license and purchase real estate property D.
Answers (1)
In the United States, national, state, and local governments spend tax money on specific activities. Which of the following is something supported through taxes?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
What conditions can encourage the desire for reform
Answers (1)
Should Germany the country of Germany have been punished for WW 1? Explain why
Answers (1)
What was one difference between the middle colonies and New England? O A. The middle colonies had poor conditions for farming. O B. New England had better farmland. O C. The middle colonies concentrated more on manufacturing and trade. O D.
Answers (1)
20 pts Question: Why was the Suez Canal so important that countries almost went to war over control of it?
Answers (1)
How were trusts and holding companies treated under the law? A. both were subject to anti-monopoly laws B. both were exempt from anti-monopoly laws C. a trust was subject to enter monopoly laws, while a holding company was not D.
Answers (2)