Ask Question
10 July, 21:43

In Dred Scott's court case, Scott argued he should be free because he had lived in

A) Missouri and Maine.

B) California and Virginia.

C) Kansas and Nebraska.

D) Illinois and Wisconsin.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 10 July, 23:39
    0
    D. Illinois and Wisconsin because Dr. Emerson took Dred Scott there, and he claimed freedom because they were above the 36/30 line and therefore ruled as free
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “In Dred Scott's court case, Scott argued he should be free because he had lived in A) Missouri and Maine. B) California and Virginia. C) ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers