Ask Question
HistoryHistory
30 December, 02:24

Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 30 December, 02:39
    0
    The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.

    They determine how multiple sources differ.

    They compare and contrast the ideas from multiple resources

    Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
True or false The formal statement of a resolution always begins with the word whereas.
Answers (2)
Which aspect of the March on Washington sent a powerful statement to the United States and the world?
Answers (1)
Why was kindergarten included in education?
Answers (2)
Between 1830 and 1860, how did the population of cities in the United States change?
Answers (1)
What happend In then election of 1796
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
What made many people rich in Rhode Island rich?
Answers (1)
What was the main reason for the english civil war of 1642?
Answers (1)
Describe some of the problems americans faced immediately after the end of world war 1
Answers (1)
Jay's Treaty of 1794:
Answers (1)
5 reasons for Jamestown success
Answers (1)
Home » History » Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion
Sign Up Forgot Password?