Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?

Question

History

Guest

7 November, 17:01

Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Dillon Floyd · Answer 1

researcher uses Primary Sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts that are documented that shows how something or someone tested and successful did.

Patience Guerrero · Answer 2

A researcher uses Primary sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts of the witnesses that physically watched it happen. their accounts are often more reliable.