Ask Question
7 November, 17:01

Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 7 November, 18:01
    0
    researcher uses Primary Sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts that are documented that shows how something or someone tested and successful did.
  2. 7 November, 19:38
    0
    A researcher uses Primary sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts of the witnesses that physically watched it happen. their accounts are often more reliable.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.? ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers