History

Samir

28 April, 13:05

Stanley is on trial for an attempted burglary. The prosecutor found evidence that could potentially convict Stanley. However, this evidence was obtained from Stanley's mother's house without a search warrant. Why is this evidence considered inadmissible in the court of law?

because it is irrelevant to the case at hand

because it violates the Fourth Amendment

because it defies the judge's good faith

because it questions the jury's

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “Stanley is on trial for an attempted burglary. The prosecutor found evidence that could potentially convict Stanley. However, this evidence ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

How much did the u. s grow as a result of the Louisiana purchase

Study guide for chapter 22: A clash of cultures 1920-1929

Why did economics change during the Industrial Revolution?

How did the Mexican Revolution affect other Latin American nations?

What was promised after the war ended

New Questions in History

Explain why the progressive approach to reform at home was or was not consistent with the practice of imperialism overseas.

Women were limited to certain jobs, such as teacher or seamstress. Most jobs paid women less than men, even for the same work. Many companies did not allow women to work once they married.

What was the basic political unit of the sumer

What did Germany and the Soviet Union agree to with the nonaggression pact

Which was a key message of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail"?