True or false that Abington school district v. Schempp established that illegally seized evidence could not be used in court?

False

This case focused on forced religion in public schools. The case revolves around a Pennsylvania school that forced students to hear and read different parts of the Bible as part of their curriculum. Schempp argued that this is a violation of the first amendment right of freedom of speech, as the state (aka any government/public entity) should not promote a specific religion. The Supreme Court judges voted 8-1 in favor of Schempp.