In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford argued that A. an enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom. B. a person's property can't be taken away without due process. C. enslaved workers should not be considered property. D. enslaved workers should have the right to a trial by jury.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford argued that A. an enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom. B. a person's property ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Why did the nazis create extermination camps?
Answers (1)
On what continent is the southweatern part of persian empire located
Answers (1)
What was Roosevelt's purpose in packing the courts
Answers (1)
How many airplanes were hijacked in 9/11?
Answers (1)
Which were major reasons that many people left England and came to the American colonies? A. interest in getting rich quickly and escaping arrest B. desire for adventure and interest in exploration C.
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
In 1808 the U. S. banned the importation of slaves. What did many people hope this would lead to? A. a swift end to slavery in the U. S. B. a thriving slave trade within the U. S. C. the gradual abolition of slavery in the U. S. D.
Answers (1)
Why does micheal Lewis begin his speech with humor and the request that the students give themselves a round of applause
Answers (1)
Wat is " An Elephant's excellent trunk"mostly about?
Answers (1)
State governments, like the federal government, has three branches. The purpose of having three branches is to balance power so that no one branch or person becomes too powerful. Group of answer choices True False
Answers (1)
The English turned down the Albany Plan of Union because they preferred to deal with the colonies individually rather than as a group. a. True b. False
Answers (1)