Ask Question
29 December, 21:52

Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.)

Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.

The original case was decided in a different type of court than the current case.

The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

The judge in the ruling case did not use all the facts presented when making a decision.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 29 December, 23:24
    0
    The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

    The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

    this one makes some sense

    Explanation:

    if they both get charged the judge can make them speak
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.) Some of the ...” in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers