Long-arm statutes: Question 9 options: give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. have been ruled unconstitutional. are simply procedural statutes that still require

Question

Law

William Harper

5 July, 19:07

Long-arm statutes: Question 9 options: give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. have been ruled unconstitutional. are simply procedural statutes that still require

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Gillian Rocha · Answer 1

This question is Incomplete, here is the complete question:

Long-arm statutes: Question 9 options:

A. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.

B. have been ruled unconstitutional.

C. are simply procedural statutes that still require "minimum contacts" for use.

D. none of the above.

Answer:

C. are simply procedural statutes that still require "minimum contacts" for use.

Explanation:

A long-arm statute is a kind of statute that empowers a court to obtain individual jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant on the grounds of certain acts committed by an out-of-state defendant, as far as the defendant has enough connection with the state.