Law

Jade Arroyo

24 June, 07:47

The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and began to search for the man because "the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investigation if to do so would gravely endanger their lives or the lives of others" in:a. Payton v. New York b. Warden v. Hayden c. United States v. Watson d. Tennessee v. Garner

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and ...” in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Alcohol lowers inhibitions making a driver more aggressive and less defensive. a true b) false

What is the "employment-at-will" doctrine? What are the exceptions to this doctrine

Contrast the prosecutor's role as an elected official and a crime fighter

Qué significa que no todas las normas jurídicas tienen el mismo grado de jerarquía.

An airplane descends at the average speed of 215 feet per second for 7 seconds.

New Questions in Law

The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers. T/F

What are the pros and cons of public prisons

What is the difference between the supreme courts and the district courts

Which of the following is an exception to the rule that administrative searches usually require search warrants? a. The administrative exceptionb. The reasonable-search exceptionc. The pervasive-regulation exceptiond. The compelling-need exceptione.

What law is handed down by a king or higher authority