Ask Question
24 August, 23:39

Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today?

(A) Hair samples are replacing DNA as an easily available, go-to source for identifying suspects.

(B) Modern changes in the discipline mean that any police officer can provide testimony on hair samples.

(C) Hair samples are necessary for most convictions.

(D) There's solid research that should lead us to be skeptical of testimony based on hair samples.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 25 August, 02:20
    0
    Answer: I would say A

    Explanation:

    Due to the simple fact that a hair simple contains DNA

    Also, It couldn't be B because it is not a form of discipline

    Where In the option of C it is not necessary for a conviction

    Answer choice D; a hair sample is not going to lead to skeptical testimony because it is not testimonial evidence.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today? (A) Hair samples are replacing DNA as an ...” in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers