Sign In
Ask Question
Law
Essence Daniel
7 April, 23:51
What happen in the case of karsales v wallis
+1
Answers (
1
)
Scarlett Watkins
8 April, 01:25
0
The issue in this case was whether the exclusion clause was valid even in cases where there was a fundamental breach of the contract.
Explanation:
The Defendant, Mr. Wallis, had agreed to buy a used car if the vendor was able to find a company in which the Defendant could enter into a hire-purchase agreement. The vendor found such a company. Once the agreement was entered into, the Defendant inspected the vehicle he had agreed to purchase through the hire purchase agreement and found that it had been sustainable altered from the version he had seen and agreed to buy. Mainly, the radio was missing, as were the chrome strips around the body, the new tires had been replaced by old ones, the bumper was not held together with rope and perhaps most importantly, the car could not start. Mr. Wallis refused to pay for the car. The hire purchase agreement contained an exclusion clause which stated that 'No condition or warranty that the vehicle is roadworthy or as to its age, condition or fitness for any purpose is given by the owner or implied herein.'
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅
“What happen in the case of karsales v wallis ...”
in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What is your mums name?
Answers (2)
Carol shoots her father Carl with malice aforethought. He thereafter lingers in a coma for two months and then dies.
Answers (1)
What was one major weakness of the Articles of Confederation? O A. It could be easily changed to benefit the largest states. O B. It prevented the government from signing treaties. O C. It failed to organize the country's western territories. O D.
Answers (1)
The law that requires owners of vehicles to carry insurance policies with minimum coverage limits of $10,000 dollars of PIP and PDL is the no-fault law. financial responsibility law. move over act. traffic law.
Answers (1)
Which of the following statements about prison research is true? Participation in research can be considered during parole hearings. Researchers may study the effects of privilege upgrades awarded by the prison.
Answers (1)
New Questions in Law
Does racial background affects someone's ability to recognize someone of different race
Answers (2)
The government produces public goods in order to__all of society
Answers (1)
Evaluate the following interpretation of the Poletown decision: "The bargaining costs between GM and the neighbors are so high that, even if the valuation of GM's desire to use their property was greater than the valuation on the neighbors' desire
Answers (1)
Question 1: For those students who do not take traffic school, which of the following is true? . They are 75% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident! .
Answers (2)
Match the words on the left to their definitions on the right. absentee ballot reapportionment to communicate ideas through words or actions a ballot by a voter who will be absent from a polling place on voting day the process of redistributing
Answers (1)
Home
»
Law
» What happen in the case of karsales v wallis
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?