Ask Question
27 February, 23:01

The signals on a railroad crossing are defective. Although the railroad company was notified of the problem a month earlier, the railroad inspector has failed to come by and repair them. Seeing the all-clear signal, a car drives up and stalls on the tracks as a train rounds the bend. For the past two weeks the car had been stalling, and the driver kept putting off taking the car to the shop for a tune-up. As the train rounds the bend, the engineer is distracted by a conductor and does not see the car until it is too late to stop. Who is negligent? Who must bear the liability for the damage to the car and to the train?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 28 February, 00:16
    0
    I think it's both the railroad inspector and the driver who drives the car. The railroad inspector didn't come fix the problem and the driver didn't take his car to the shop to get his problem fixed. So honestly, it's both their faults.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “The signals on a railroad crossing are defective. Although the railroad company was notified of the problem a month earlier, the railroad ...” in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers