Ask Question
13 June, 18:59

In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Supreme Court held that:

a. no Miranda warning is required during a stop and frisk.

b. Miranda does not need to be given by private police.

c. an individual being investigated by police may not be denied counsel.

d. indigent defendants are entitled to a lawyer when seeking an appeal.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 13 June, 21:30
    0
    I think the answer is c
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Supreme Court held that: a. no Miranda warning is required during a stop and frisk. b. Miranda does not ...” in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers