What change to policing resulted from Miranda v. Arizona?
O
A. Police must inform suspects that they may remain silent and have
a lawyer present during questioning.
O
B. Police must make suspects feel comfortable and encourage them
to express themselves.
O
C. Police must provide all suspects with a lawyer at the time of
arrest.
O
D. Police must respect suspects' right to free speech.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What change to policing resulted from Miranda v. Arizona? O A. Police must inform suspects that they may remain silent and have a lawyer ...” in 📙 Law if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Denise, a defense attorney, is preparing to defend her client, Alan, who has been accused of burglary. Denise has learned that the prosecution obtained evidence against Alan unconstitutionally.
Answers (1)
You are entering an intersection where you want to turn left with a green light; A: You must yield to oncoming vehicles, but pedestrians must yield to you because you have a green light.
Answers (1)
Which group would most likely investigate a person accused of election fraud in North Carolina? 1. local police officials 2. the FBI 3. the North Carolina SBI 4. the sheriff's office
Answers (2)
Question 10: When you park a vehicle with a manual transmission on a hill, you should Shut off the engine first, and then shift into gear. Leave the parking brake off. Set the parking brake first, before you shift into gear and shut off the engine.
Answers (2)
Jodi finds her brother-in-law, Cameron, irritating, but she can't avoid interacting with him because he is married to her sister. This reflects which characteristic of conflict? A. Incompatible goals B. An expressed struggle C. Interdependence D.
Answers (1)
New Questions in Law
If you were put in charge of correctional reform for your state, what changes would you make? Explain.
Answers (1)
For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove: a. that the employee was acting within the scope of his/her employment b.
Answers (1)
The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers. T/F
Answers (1)
What are the pros and cons of public prisons
Answers (1)
What is the difference between the supreme courts and the district courts
Answers (1)