Ask Question
14 January, 09:56

Prove that a relation that is reflexive and symmetric need not also be transitive.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 14 January, 11:39
    0
    We give a counterexample:

    Let R={ (a, a), (a, b), (b, a), (b, b), (c, c), (b, c), (c, b) } be a relation.

    It is reflexive as it contains (a, a), (b, b) and (c, c).

    It is symmetric as (a, b) and (b, a) are both in R; (b, c) and (c, b) are both in R.

    But it is not transitive, as (a, b) and (b, c) are in R, but (a, c) is not.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Prove that a relation that is reflexive and symmetric need not also be transitive. ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers