Ask Question
7 August, 14:06

When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = - 3, x = - 4, and x = 6. Angie says that the function is undefined at those x values. Describe a situation where Jamal is correct, and describe a situation where Angie is correct. Is it possible for a situation to exist that they are both correct? Justify your reasoning.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 7 August, 17:06
    0
    Rational function is a function that contains a fraction.

    Jamal is correct if the numerator of the fraction contains the variable x and its denominator is an integer that is not 0.

    Angie is correct if the denominator of the fraction contains the variable x and substituting the value of x will result to a denominator of 0.

    A rational function can't be a function if its denominator is 0.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “When looking at a rational function, Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = - 3, x = - ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers