Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8) - 9 as the equivalent expression 4.5 (7/8-9). Did Vance apply the associative property correctly? Why or why not? Yes, the terms with variables should be written first. Yes, the terms can be regrouped and still be equivalent.
No, the order of the terms should have been changed.
No, the addition symbol was dropped in the second expression
+5
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8) - 9 as the equivalent expression 4.5 (7/8-9). Did Vance apply the associative ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Home » Mathematics » Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8) - 9 as the equivalent expression 4.5 (7/8-9). Did Vance apply the associative property correctly? Why or why not? Yes, the terms with variables should be written first.