Ask Question
5 June, 22:23

Short-term classes: Does taking a class in a short-term format (8 weeks instead of 16 weeks) increase a student's likelihood of passing the course? For a particular course, the pass rate for the 16-week format is 59%. A team of faculty examine student data from 40 randomly selected accelerated classes and determine that the pass rate is 78%. Which of the following are the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses for this research question?

a. H0: p = 0.59; Ha: p ≠ 0.59

b. H0: p = 0.59; Ha: p > 0.59

c. H0: p = 0.78; Ha: p ≠ 0.78

d. H0: p = 0.78; Ha: p > 0.59

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 6 June, 01:27
    0
    Option b

    Step-by-step explanation:

    Given that For a particular course, the pass rate for the 16-week format is 59%. A team of faculty examine student data from 40 randomly selected accelerated classes and determine that the pass rate is 78%.

    we have to find whether taking a class in a short-term format (8 weeks instead of 16 weeks) increase a student's likelihood of passing the course

    Since pass rate for 16 weeks is 59% we check whether for 8 weeks is more than this.

    So correct null and alternative hypotheses for this research question

    would be:

    b. H0: p = 0.59; Ha: p > 0.59

    Option b is right.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Short-term classes: Does taking a class in a short-term format (8 weeks instead of 16 weeks) increase a student's likelihood of passing the ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers