Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain. Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet (s). No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners. Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s). No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s). p

Question

Mathematics

Kolton Parks

7 January, 09:18

Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain. Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet (s). No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners. Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s). No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s). p

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Gideon · Answer 1

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s).

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet (s).

No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners.

Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s).

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet (s).

According to nypost, they spend an average of $2000 + a year on their pets. So 3 owners either spending $720 on their pets each or combined is unrealistic. If this is wrong, it's because I have no idea what the function is.