Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?
A. The information was written elsewhere.
B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,
C. There are no listed source references,
D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What number makes the equation true? 82 - - 33 = 35
Answers (1)
17 cm a minute to miles per hour
Answers (1)
What is the range of this data? {3, 3, 0, 8, 7, 10, 2, 6, 12, 0} 7.5 6.5 10 12
Answers (2)
Tia kayaked 2400 meters at a constant rate in 1.5 hours on Saturday. On Sunday, she kayaked 200 meters per hour faster. What was Tia's average rate on Sunday? A. 1600 meters per hour B. 1800 meters per hour C. 2000 meters per hour D.
Answers (1)
Look at the steps used when solving 3 (x - 2) = 3 for x
Answers (1)
New Questions in Mathematics
A person invests 9000 dollars in a bank. The bank pays 4.25% interest compounded daily. To the nearest tenth of a year, how long must the person leave the money in the bank until it reaches 19600?
Answers (1)
A - 2 + 3 = - 2 What does a stand for for?
Answers (2)
What is 2 4/6 plus 1/3 equal
Answers (2)
Approximate the 5839 to the nearest 1:Ten 2:hundred Thousand 3:
Answers (1)
What is the y-intercept of y = - 3x - 2? Choose 1 answer:
Answers (1)