Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?
A. The information was written elsewhere.
B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,
C. There are no listed source references,
D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
The lengths of two sides of a right triangle are given. find the length of the third side. round to the nearest tenth if necessary.
Answers (1)
Matt is making a video for the school announcements to show the students who received awards this month. the video can only be 60seconds long. there are 9 students who will each get to have a 5-second clip to sat their name and teacher.
Answers (1)
The distance between two towns on a map is 9 centimeters. The actual distance between two towns is 63 kilometers. What is the scale on the map?
Answers (1)
50, 45, 49, 50, 43, 49, 50, 49, 45, 49, 47, 47, 44, 51, 51, 44, 47, 46, 50, 44, 51, 49, 43, 43, 49, 45, 46, 45, 51, 46. what is the range for the data set shown
Answers (1)
Solve by factoring x² + 15% + 44 = 0
Answers (1)
New Questions in Mathematics
William's salary is £24 000 His salary increases by 4%. Work out William's new salary. £ ...
Answers (1)
What is the lenth of 10
Answers (1)
What is factor give 63
Answers (2)
A number is shown in word form. "Three hundred thirteen thousand, one-hundred sixty" What is the number in expanded form?
Answers (1)
2.80=9 (70) / I. I need a answer for i
Answers (1)