Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?
A. The information was written elsewhere.
B. Anyone can post anonymous entries,
C. There are no listed source references,
D. The site is considered to be in the public domain.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source? A. The information was written elsewhere. B. Anyone can post anonymous entries, C. ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
A bag contains 22 1/2 cups. A recipe for pancakes uses 1 1/4 cups of flour. how many batches of pancakes can be made with one bag of flour
Answers (1)
Latasha made 128 ounces of punch. How many cups did she make?
Answers (2)
What is 6+r = 5r-4 (r+10)
Answers (1)
What are facts about sample space?
Answers (1)
Kevin swims 50 meters in 1. 1 minutes on his first day of swimming class. He swims the same distance in 0. 9 minute a week later. The next week, he swims the same distance in 0. 7 minute.
Answers (1)
New Questions in Mathematics
What is the area of 3 5/7ft by 2 6/7ft
Answers (1)
The probability of spinning an even number and flipping heads is
Answers (1)
Pat is paid an annual salary of $104,000. Find Pat's weekly salary.
Answers (1)
2,400 principal earning 2%, compounded annually, after 7 years. Find the balance in the account
Answers (1)
Find each probability if a die is rolled. P (divisible by 4)
Answers (1)