Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.

Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting. If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting. If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read. Therefore, Nathan likes to read.

Question

Mathematics

Edith Barrera

12 September, 19:49

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.

Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting. If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting. If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read. Therefore, Nathan likes to read.

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Fatima Brown · Answer 1

The argument is valid.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told "Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting."

"If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting."

Her hobby is stamp collecting, so her husband does not like to fish.

"If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read."

Her husband does not like to fish; therefore, Nathan likes to read.

The argument is valid.

Nolan Scott · Answer 2

Invalid arguement

Step-by-step explanation:

You can't say Loretta's hobby isn't stamp collecting if her husband likes to fish. It is illogical. Same deal with Nathan liking to read. Illogical.

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting. If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting. If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read. Therefore, Nathan likes to read.

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.

Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting. If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting. If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read. Therefore, Nathan likes to read.