Ask Question
26 December, 22:39

Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT. Given: A = O, W = N, SW = TN.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 26 December, 23:13
    0
    The answer is ASA.

    Given that ∠A = ∠O, ∠W = ∠N, SW = TN, this shows that the two angles (∠A and ∠W) and the included side SW of the first triangle are equal to the two angles (∠O and ∠N) and the included side TN of the second triangle. This means that third angles ∠S and ∠T are also equal. Therefore, the two triangles ΔWAS and ΔNOT are congruent based from the ASA Postulate.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that WAS NOT. Given: A = O, W = N, SW = TN. ...” in 📙 Mathematics if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers