Art, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the entrance to banquet's hall, art finds it nearly impossible to enter and exit. for repeatedly failing to be on time, banquet replaces art with connie, who does not have a disability. refer to fact pattern 35-3. to successfully defend against art's claim, banquet will have to show that

a. the individual who replaced art is qualified for the position.

b. art consistently failed to meet the essential requirements of his job.

c. the doors were not installed as an act of intentional discrimination.

d. banquet cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship

Question

Social Studies

Rambler

17 June, 02:27

Art, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the entrance to banquet's hall, art finds it nearly impossible to enter and exit. for repeatedly failing to be on time, banquet replaces art with connie, who does not have a disability. refer to fact pattern 35-3. to successfully defend against art's claim, banquet will have to show that

a. the individual who replaced art is qualified for the position.

b. art consistently failed to meet the essential requirements of his job.

c. the doors were not installed as an act of intentional discrimination.

d. banquet cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Walter Bray · Answer 1

Answer - D (Banquet cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship)

To successfully defend against art's claim, banquet will have to show that they cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship. Under the Americans with disabilities act, employers who do not accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities must prove that doing so would cause undue hardship.