Ask Question
7 July, 16:18

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 7 July, 20:02
    0
    The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress. ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers