Ask Question
6 October, 00:00

According to Howard, Barrett, and Frick (2010), in order to make appropriate choices educators must understand the ways in which hiding or showing the identity of participants can impact the interaction that takes place in peer feedback activities. Obscuring the identity of participants in peer feedback "may create a social context where learners feel freer to express varied ideas, and make the task of giving feedback less inhibited" (p. 90). References: Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43 (1), 89-112. Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

a. Word-for-Word

b. plagiarism

c. Paraphrasing plagiarism

d. This is not plagiarism

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 6 October, 02:17
    0
    This is not plagiarism

    Explanation:

    The student's version clearly provides a well referenced version of his own ideas of what the authors said. In the area where he wrote word for word, there were quotation marks to show that it is the direct words of Howard, Barrett, and Frick (2010), and according to APA standards of citation, he appropriately put the page number at the end of the text to show knowledge of citations.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “According to Howard, Barrett, and Frick (2010), in order to make appropriate choices educators must understand the ways in which hiding or ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers