Ask Question
28 August, 04:15

Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or

unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 28 August, 06:05
    0
    It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.
  2. 28 August, 08:05
    0
    Answer:unconstitutional
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Question: According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or unconstitutional? What is their reasoning? ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers