Physical evidence is convincing to juries because it is seen as objective and based on physical reality rather than on witness opinions. True False

This statement is True. Physical evidence is seen as more objective.

Explanation:

Witness opinions are considered subjective accounts and they can be subject to bias and inaccuracies so they are seen as less concrete and reliable as evidence. It builds a stronger case against a defendant if the prosecution can provide physical evidence that a crime or wrongdoing occurred. Another related term is circumstantial evidence which would imply that someone might be guilty of a crime without the physical proof, like being caught holding a gun at a crime scene for instance. The circumstantial evidence would be being seen holding the gun; the physical evidence would be proof the bullets came from the gun.