Most local elections in the United States are nonpartisan, meaning a

candidate's partisan affiliation is not listed on the ballot. Given what we

know about political parties, how might the dynamic of a nonpartisan

election compare to that of a partisan election? What would seem to be the

strengths of nonpartisan elections? The weaknesses? Overall, do

nonpartisan elections appear to be good for democracy, or might they

weaken it?

Question

Social Studies

Serena Conner

4 February, 04:17

Most local elections in the United States are nonpartisan, meaning a

candidate's partisan affiliation is not listed on the ballot. Given what we

know about political parties, how might the dynamic of a nonpartisan

election compare to that of a partisan election? What would seem to be the

strengths of nonpartisan elections? The weaknesses? Overall, do

nonpartisan elections appear to be good for democracy, or might they

weaken it?

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Brayden Freeman · Answer 1

Municipal election frameworks are dictated by the idea of the board individuals' voting public and by the nearness or nonattendance of gathering marks on the ballot. The nonappearance of gathering names confounds voters; a voter who must look over among a gathering of up-and-comers whom the person thinks nothing about will have no significant premise in throwing a polling form.

Non-partisanship will, in general, produce authorities more agents of the upper financial strata than of the general people and irritated the class inclination in casting a ballot turnout.