Speaking at a college graduation ceremony, Professor Robson compared college graduates with adults who are less educated. She correctly noted that college graduates pay more taxes, vote more frequently, engage in more volunteer activities in their communities, and are less likely to go to jail than less-educated adults. The professor concluded that colleges obviously do great things for society. How might you reasonably challenge the way the professor reached her conclusion?

Answer and Explanation:

The professor came to the conclusion that the schools and communities accomplish incredible things for the general public based on the duty paying or community action. He totally neglected to authorize the understudies for their diligent work and the journey to get a new line of work that keeps them utilized and qualified to make good on the government obligations.

The professor has completely neglected the fact that the students in colleges and universities volunteer into social work as their own decision - as explained by the word volunteering, and that the particular student has the intent of non indulgence into criminal activities so as to go to jail. The indulgence into criminal activities is partially education related, as being more educated does open up new horizons, but on the other hand it is also completely the free will of the individual, if he wants to perform any such activities even after being educated. There have been instances where even the college graduates have performed crimes and such as hacking or fraud or bank theft.

Thus, it can be concluded that indulgence into any sorts of criminal activities can be accredited to a person's needs and their financial and employment status.